Making "good" teachers: a study of power, discourse, and edtpa

Show simple item record

dc.contributor Kuntz, Aaron M.
dc.contributor Major, Claire Howell
dc.contributor Shelton, Stephanie Anne
dc.contributor Surman, Stacy H.
dc.contributor.advisor Guyotte, Kelly W. Byrne, Caitlin Anne 2019-02-12T14:31:50Z 2019-02-12T14:31:50Z 2018
dc.identifier.other u0015_0000001_0003240
dc.identifier.other Byrne_alatus_0004D_13715
dc.description Electronic Thesis or Dissertation
dc.description.abstract In this qualitative study, I examined the ways that power operates through edTPA’s discourse of good teaching as it invites teacher candidates to act in particular ways as they attempt to be recognized as good teachers. This study was guided by three research questions: How is good teaching discursively constructed in edTPA? How do undergraduate teacher candidates at a large flagship institution in the southeastern United States position themselves in relation to edTPA’s discourse when discussing good teaching? How do undergraduate teacher candidates attempt to make themselves knowable as good teachers through the edTPA process? After situating edTPA historically and locating it as the latest in a series of educational reform efforts that stem from four decades of crisis rhetoric, I examined critiques of edTPA in the literature. Given edTPA’s controversial nature, this study aimed adds to the growing body of knowledge about edTPA and its role in teacher education. Specifically, this study endeavored to provide insight into the concerns raised by some scholars about how edTPA defines good teaching and what that means for teacher candidates and teacher education programs. In this study, I interviewed three teacher candidates who had recently completed edTPA about their understanding of good teaching and their experience with edTPA. The participants also created two artifacts related to good teaching. Foucauldian notions of discipline, power, and discourse informed the methodology used in this study. Specifically, I developed my own approach to Foucauldian discourse analysis, drawing from Willig’s (2008) stages of analysis, Saldaña’s (2013) coding methods, and Gee’s (2011b) tools for analyzing discourse, and used these methods to identify discursive constructions of good teaching in the edTPA handbook (Stanford Center for Assessment, Learning and Equity, 2017b) as well as to examine teacher candidates’ positionings and practices relative to those discursive constructions. I found that teacher candidates engaged in behaviors that they felt would give them the best chance of being recognized as good teachers by edTPA. These practices included strategic portfolio submissions and foregoing valued teaching practices in order to engage in a practice that aligned with edTPA’s discourse of good teaching. These findings raise important questions about what value edTPA adds to teacher education.
dc.format.extent 211 p.
dc.format.medium electronic
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf
dc.language English
dc.language.iso en_US
dc.publisher University of Alabama Libraries
dc.relation.ispartof The University of Alabama Electronic Theses and Dissertations
dc.relation.ispartof The University of Alabama Libraries Digital Collections
dc.relation.hasversion born digital
dc.rights All rights reserved by the author unless otherwise indicated.
dc.subject.other Teacher education
dc.subject.other Educational tests & measurements
dc.subject.other Education
dc.title Making "good" teachers: a study of power, discourse, and edtpa
dc.type thesis
dc.type text University of Alabama. Department of Educational Studies in Psychology, Research Methodology, and Counseling Educational Research The University of Alabama doctoral Ph.D.

Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


My Account