Revisiting empathy deficits in psychopathy

Show simple item record

dc.contributor Glenn, Andrea L.
dc.contributor Han, Hyemin
dc.contributor McDonald, Kristina L.
dc.contributor Salekin, Randall T.
dc.contributor.advisor Hart, William P.
dc.contributor.author Tortoriello, Gregory Kenneth
dc.date.accessioned 2021-05-12T16:28:13Z
dc.date.available 2021-05-12T16:28:13Z
dc.date.issued 2020-08
dc.identifier.other u0015_0000001_0003700
dc.identifier.other Tortoriello_alatus_0004D_14297
dc.identifier.uri http://ir.ua.edu/handle/123456789/7643
dc.description Electronic Thesis or Dissertation
dc.description.abstract The present study revisited the foundational assumption of empathy deficits in psychopathy by addressing three considerations: (1) a two-componential operationalization of empathy as the congruence between perceiving a target’s emotional state (perceived target emotion) and expressing that emotional state for the target (vicarious emotion); (2) the heterogeneity of empathic emotional expressions; and (3) the multidimensionality of psychopathy. I hypothesized that only fearless dominance/antagonism dimensions would be related to lower scores on empathy components—perceived target emotion and vicarious emotion—only for distress-based emotions (sadness and fear), not for anger. I also hypothesized that all psychopathy dimensions would approach zero relations with empathy indices. First, participants self-reported two-factor, “Triarchic,” and four-factor psychopathy. Next, they read four empathy scenarios each describing a situation in which a target experiences an unfortunate outcome. Each scenario accompanied two distinct resolutions designed to evoke either empathic distress or empathic anger. After reading each resolution, participants rated situational appraisals and empathy components vis-à-vis sadness, fear, and anger. Empathy indices were operationalized by two difference scores: (1) the relative difference between vicarious emotion and perceived target emotion and (2) the absolute correspondence between the two empathy components, such that higher scores represent more empathic responding. Results appeared to be best synthesized by grouping psychopathy dimensions under four classifications: interpersonal antagonism (primary psychopathy, meanness, interpersonal manipulation), risk-taking propensity (boldness, erratic lifestyle), impulsive antisociality (disinhibition, antisocial behavior), and callous affect. Consistent with hypotheses, interpersonal antagonism and callous affect dimensions were generally related to lower scores on empathy components aggregated across resolutions, but inconsistent with hypotheses, were also related to lower scores on empathy difference scores. Somewhat inconsistent with hypotheses, risk-taking propensity dimensions manifested generally weaker patterns on empathy components—including very weakly positive relations to perceived target anger—but similar patterns on empathy difference scores. Somewhat inconsistent with hypotheses, impulsive antisociality dimensions were generally related to lower scores on empathy components but very weakly related to empathy difference scores. All associations remained nearly unchanged after controlling for gender. In summary, the present data are consistent with empathy deficits in psychopathy but also highlight the complexity of this psychopathy-empathy link.
dc.format.extent 106 p.
dc.format.medium electronic
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf
dc.language English
dc.language.iso en_US
dc.publisher University of Alabama Libraries
dc.relation.ispartof The University of Alabama Electronic Theses and Dissertations
dc.relation.ispartof The University of Alabama Libraries Digital Collections
dc.relation.hasversion born digital
dc.rights All rights reserved by the author unless otherwise indicated.
dc.subject.other Personality psychology
dc.subject.other Experimental psychology
dc.subject.other Social psychology
dc.title Revisiting empathy deficits in psychopathy
dc.type thesis
dc.type text
etdms.degree.department University of Alabama. Department of Psychology
etdms.degree.discipline Psychology
etdms.degree.grantor The University of Alabama
etdms.degree.level doctoral
etdms.degree.name Ph.D.


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Browse

My Account