An Intersectional Identity Approach to Chronic Pain Disparities Using Latent Class Analysis

dc.contributorCox, Jennifer
dc.contributorDaquin, Jane
dc.contributorGunn, Heather
dc.contributor.advisorThorn, Beverly E.
dc.contributor.advisorAllen, Rebecca S.
dc.contributor.authorNewman, Andrea K
dc.contributor.otherUniversity of Alabama Tuscaloosa
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-13T20:34:06Z
dc.date.available2022-04-13T20:34:06Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.descriptionElectronic Thesis or Dissertationen_US
dc.description.abstractChronic pain is a highly prevalent and costly condition with substantial negative effects. However, health care differences exist in prevalence, pain assessment, treatment, and outcomes based on demographic characteristics. There has been a recent increase in health disparity research. Many studies have examined the relationships between independent factors of disparity (e.g., race, sex, income, age, etc.) and health outcomes. Research is limited on the interaction of these independent factors (e.g., female Black/African-American, low-income older adult, etc.). Given the high frequency of individuals with multiple disparity factors, applying an intersectional identity approach to chronic pain disparity research is important. Latent class analysis (LCA) examined chronic pain disparities with an intersectional identity theory approach in the Learning About My Pain (LAMP) trial, a randomized comparative effectiveness study of group-based psychosocial interventions (PCORI Contract #941, Beverly Thorn, PI; clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT01967342) for patients receiving care for chronic pain at low-income clinics in rural and suburban Alabama. LCA results suggested a 5-class model with meaningful differences in factors related to disparities. Cross-sectional results highlighted the importance of SES, age, and race in the experience of chronic pain. The latent disparity profiles varied by pre-treatment chronic pain functioning and there was some evidence that individuals with moderate disparities (i.e., low literacy/education, older Black/African-American adults, and disability) benefited more from Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy (CBT) than Pain Education (EDU). There were no significant heterogeneity of treatment effects when examining CBT or EDU versus Usual-Care (UC). The intersectional identity theory approach provided an integrated picture of chronic pain disparities and increased information for future treatment adaptations that meet the specific needs of individuals with similar social identities.en_US
dc.format.mediumelectronic
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.otherhttp://purl.lib.ua.edu/182091
dc.identifier.otheru0015_0000001_0004244
dc.identifier.otherNewman_alatus_0004D_13869
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ua.edu/handle/123456789/8423
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of Alabama Libraries
dc.relation.hasversionborn digital
dc.relation.ispartofThe University of Alabama Electronic Theses and Dissertations
dc.relation.ispartofThe University of Alabama Libraries Digital Collections
dc.rightsAll rights reserved by the author unless otherwise indicated.en_US
dc.subjectChronic pain
dc.subjectdisparities
dc.subjecthealth care inequalities
dc.subjectheterogeneity of treatment effects
dc.subjectIntersectionality
dc.subjectLatent class analysis
dc.titleAn Intersectional Identity Approach to Chronic Pain Disparities Using Latent Class Analysisen_US
dc.typethesis
dc.typetext
etdms.degree.departmentUniversity of Alabama. Department of Psychology
etdms.degree.disciplinePsychology
etdms.degree.grantorThe University of Alabama
etdms.degree.leveldoctoral
etdms.degree.namePh.D.
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
u0015_0000001_0004244.pdf
Size:
779.92 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format