Factor Structure and Criterion Validity of the Five Cs Model of Positive Youth Development in a Multi-University Sample of College Students

dc.contributor.authorDvorsky, Melissa R.
dc.contributor.authorKofler, Michael J.
dc.contributor.authorBurns, G. Leonard
dc.contributor.authorLuebbe, Aaron M.
dc.contributor.authorGarner, Annie A.
dc.contributor.authorJarrett, Matthew A.
dc.contributor.authorSoto, Elia F.
dc.contributor.authorBecker, Stephen P.
dc.contributor.otherCincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
dc.contributor.otherUniversity of California San Francisco
dc.contributor.otherFlorida State University
dc.contributor.otherWashington State University
dc.contributor.otherMiami University
dc.contributor.otherSaint Louis University
dc.contributor.otherUniversity of Alabama Tuscaloosa
dc.contributor.otherUniversity of Cincinnati
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-28T20:49:44Z
dc.date.available2023-09-28T20:49:44Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.description.abstractThere is growing recognition that clinical and developmental outcomes will be optimized by interventions that harness strengths in addition to ameliorating deficits. Although empirically-supported methods for identifying strengths are available for children and adolescents, this framework has yet to be applied to emerging adulthood. This study evaluates the nature of the Five Cs model of Positive Youth Development (PYD) - character, confidence, competence, connection, and caring - in a sample of emerging adults from six universities (N=4654; 70% female; 81% White). Historically, PYD has been modeled as either separate correlated factors or a second-order factor structure. More recently, the bifactor model has been recommended to determine the degree to which PYD is unidimensional versus multidimensional. The present study examined the multidimensionality of PYD by comparing the model fit of a one-factor, five-correlated factor model, and second-order factor structure with a bifactor model and found support for the bifactor model with evidence of invariance across sex. Criterion validity was also assessed using three criterion measures particularly relevant for adjustment during emerging adulthood: anxiety, depressive symptoms, and emotion regulation difficulties. PYD and the residual Cs tended to correlate negatively with indicators of maladaptive development. Future directions including applications of the PYD framework as a measure of thriving across emerging adulthood are discussed.en_US
dc.format.mediumelectronic
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.citationDvorsky, M. R., Kofler, M. J., Burns, G. L., Luebbe, A. M., Garner, A. A., Jarrett, M. A., Soto, E. F., & Becker, S. P. (2018). Factor Structure and Criterion Validity of the Five Cs Model of Positive Youth Development in a Multi-University Sample of College Students. In Journal of Youth and Adolescence (Vol. 48, Issue 3, pp. 537–553). Springer Science and Business Media LLC. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-018-0938-y
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10964-018-0938-y
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-9046-5183
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-7267-7836
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-8604-3647
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-4984-9411
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ua.edu/handle/123456789/11862
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherSpringer
dc.subjectFactor structure
dc.subjectFive Cs
dc.subjectInternalizing
dc.subjectPositive youth development
dc.subjectResilience
dc.subjectPsychometrics
dc.subjectGOODNESS-OF-FIT
dc.subjectCOVARIANCE STRUCTURE-ANALYSIS
dc.subjectANXIETY STRESS SCALES
dc.subjectLONGITUDINAL ANALYSIS
dc.subjectBECK DEPRESSION
dc.subjectMENTAL-HEALTH
dc.subjectADOLESCENCE
dc.subjectRESILIENCE
dc.subjectINDEXES
dc.subjectRISK
dc.subjectPsychology, Developmental
dc.titleFactor Structure and Criterion Validity of the Five Cs Model of Positive Youth Development in a Multi-University Sample of College Studentsen_US
dc.typeArticle
dc.typetext

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
10.1007s10964-018-0938-y.pdf
Size:
467.25 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format