UA cloudflare authentication

 

Cadence (steps/min) and relative intensity in 21 to 60-year-olds: the CADENCE-adults study

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorMcAvoy, Cayla R.
dc.contributor.authorMoore, Christopher C.
dc.contributor.authorAguiar, Elroy J.
dc.contributor.authorDucharme, Scott W.
dc.contributor.authorSchuna, John M., Jr.
dc.contributor.authorBarreira, Tiago V.
dc.contributor.authorChase, Colleen J.
dc.contributor.authorGould, Zachary R.
dc.contributor.authorAmalbert-Birriel, Marcos A.
dc.contributor.authorChipkin, Stuart R.
dc.contributor.authorStaudenmayer, John
dc.contributor.authorTudor-Locke, Catrine
dc.contributor.authorMora-Gonzalez, Jose
dc.contributor.otherUniversity of North Carolina
dc.contributor.otherUniversity of North Carolina Charlotte
dc.contributor.otherUniversity of North Carolina Chapel Hill
dc.contributor.otherUniversity of Alabama Tuscaloosa
dc.contributor.otherCalifornia State University Long Beach
dc.contributor.otherOregon State University
dc.contributor.otherSyracuse University
dc.contributor.otherUniversity of Massachusetts Amherst
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-28T19:36:21Z
dc.date.available2023-09-28T19:36:21Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.description.abstractBackground: Heuristic cadence (steps/min) thresholds of >= 100 and >= 130 steps/min correspond with absolutely-defined moderate (3 metabolic equivalents [METs]; 1 MET = 3.5 mL O-2 center dot kg(- 1)center dot min(- 1)) and vigorous (6 METs) intensity, respectively. Scarce evidence informs cadence thresholds for relatively-defined moderate (>= 64% heart rate maximum [HRmax = 220-age], >= 40%HR reserve [HRR = HRmax -HRresting, and >= 12 Rating of Perceived Exertion [RPE]); or vigorous intensity (>= 77%HRmax, >= 60%HRR, and >= 14 RPE). Purpose: To identify heuristic cadence thresholds corresponding with relatively-defined moderate and vigorous intensity in 21-60-year-olds. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 157 adults (40.4 +/- 11.5 years; 50.6% men) completed up to twelve 5-min treadmill bouts, beginning at 0.5 mph and increasing by 0.5 mph. Steps were directly observed, HR was measured with chest-worn monitors, and RPE was queried in the final minute of each bout. Segmented mixed model regression and Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analyses identified optimal cadence thresholds, stratified by age (21-30, 31-40, 41-50, and 51-60 years). Reconciliation of the two analytical models, including trade-offs between sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and overall accuracy, yielded final heuristic cadences. Results: Across all moderate intensity indicators, the segmented regression models estimated optimal cadence thresholds ranging from 123.8-127.5 (ages 21-30), 121.3-126.0 (ages 31-40), 117.7-122.7 (ages 41-50), and 113.3-116.1 steps/min (ages 51-60). Corresponding values for vigorous intensity were 140.3-144.1, 140.2-142.6, 139.3-143.6, and 131.6-132.8 steps/min, respectively. ROC analysis estimated chronologically-arranged age groups' cadence thresholds ranging from 114.5-118, 113.5-114.5, 104.6-112.9, and 103.6-106.0 across all moderate intensity indicators, and 127.5, 121.5, 117.2-123.2, and 113.0 steps/min, respectively, for vigorous intensity. Conclusions: Heuristic cadence thresholds corresponding to relatively-defined moderate intensity for the chronologically-arranged age groups were >= 120, 120, 115, and 105 steps/min, regardless of the intensity indicator (i.e., % HRmax, %HRR, or RPE). Corresponding heuristic values for vigorous intensity indicators were >= 135, 130, 125, and 120 steps/min. These cadences are useful for predicting/programming intensity aligned with age-associated differences in physiological response to, and perceived experiences of, moderate and/or vigorous intensity.en_US
dc.format.mediumelectronic
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.citationMcAvoy, C. R., Moore, C. C., Aguiar, E. J., Ducharme, S. W., Schuna, J. M., Jr, Barreira, T. V., Chase, C. J., Gould, Z. R., Amalbert-Birriel, M. A., Chipkin, S. R., Staudenmayer, J., Tudor-Locke, C., & Mora-Gonzalez, J. (2021). Cadence (steps/min) and relative intensity in 21 to 60-year-olds: the CADENCE-adults study. The International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-021-01096-w
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12966-021-01096-w
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-2346-8776
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-3455-8419
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-4763-0491
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-7098-9844
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ua.edu/handle/123456789/11549
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherBMC
dc.rights.licenseAttribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectAccelerometer
dc.subjectExercise
dc.subjectOxygen consumption
dc.subjectPhysical activity
dc.subjectPhysiology
dc.subjectStep rate
dc.subjectPHYSICAL-ACTIVITY
dc.subjectSTEP COUNT
dc.subjectRECOMMENDATIONS
dc.subjectPREDICTION
dc.subjectINACTIVITY
dc.subjectMORTALITY
dc.subjectEXERCISE
dc.subjectVALIDITY
dc.subjectMODERATE
dc.subjectFITNESS
dc.subjectNutrition & Dietetics
dc.titleCadence (steps/min) and relative intensity in 21 to 60-year-olds: the CADENCE-adults studyen_US
dc.typeArticle
dc.typetext

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
PMC7877025-12966_2021_Article_1096.pdf
Size:
1019.26 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download

Collections

Research and Publications - Department of Human Nutrition and Hospitality Management