A luscious fruit: America's annexation of Hawaii
| dc.contributor | Fry, Joseph A. | |
| dc.contributor | Frederickson, Kari A. | |
| dc.contributor | Dorr, Lisa Lindquist | |
| dc.contributor | Bunker, Steven B. | |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Jones, Howard | |
| dc.contributor.author | Bruce, Becky L. | |
| dc.contributor.other | University of Alabama Tuscaloosa | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2017-04-26T14:22:20Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2017-04-26T14:22:20Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2012 | |
| dc.description | Electronic Thesis or Dissertation | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | This dissertation argues that the annexation of Hawaii was not the result of an aggressive move by the United States to gain coaling stations or foreign markets, nor was it a means of preempting other foreign nations from acquiring the island or mending a psychic wound in the United States. Rather, the acquisition was the result of a seventy-year relationship brokered by Americans living on the islands and entered into by two nations attempting to find their place in the international system. Foreign policy decisions by both nations led to an increasingly dependent relationship linking Hawaii's stability to the U.S. economy and the United States' world power status to its access to Hawaiian ports. Analysis of this seventy-year relationship changed over time as the two nations evolved within the world system. In an attempt to maintain independence, the Hawaiian monarchy had introduced a westernized political and economic system to the islands to gain international recognition as a nation-state. This new system created a highly partisan atmosphere between natives and foreign residents who overthrew the monarchy to preserve their personal status against a rising native political challenge. These men then applied for annexation to the United States, forcing Washington to confront the final obstacle in its rise to first-tier status: its own reluctance to assume the burdens and responsibilities of an imperial policy abroad. Ultimately, the formal step of annexation was a reaction to events in the periphery, not an aggressive move by the United States minister or in response to the Spanish-American War. | en_US |
| dc.format.extent | 320 p. | |
| dc.format.medium | electronic | |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
| dc.identifier.other | u0015_0000001_0000878 | |
| dc.identifier.other | Bruce_alatus_0004D_10988 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://ir.ua.edu/handle/123456789/2914 | |
| dc.language | English | |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | |
| dc.publisher | University of Alabama Libraries | |
| dc.relation.hasversion | born digital | |
| dc.relation.ispartof | The University of Alabama Electronic Theses and Dissertations | |
| dc.relation.ispartof | The University of Alabama Libraries Digital Collections | |
| dc.rights | All rights reserved by the author unless otherwise indicated. | en_US |
| dc.subject | History | |
| dc.title | A luscious fruit: America's annexation of Hawaii | en_US |
| dc.type | thesis | |
| dc.type | text | |
| etdms.degree.department | University of Alabama. Department of History | |
| etdms.degree.discipline | History | |
| etdms.degree.grantor | The University of Alabama | |
| etdms.degree.level | doctoral | |
| etdms.degree.name | Ph.D. |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1