High-Intensity Interval Training in the Heat

Show simple item record

dc.contributor Leeper, James
dc.contributor MacDonald, Hayley
dc.contributor Mota, Jacob
dc.contributor Richardson, Mark
dc.contributor.advisor Wingo, Jonathan
dc.contributor.author Yoder, Hillary Anne
dc.date.accessioned 2022-09-28T14:55:29Z
dc.date.available 2022-09-28T14:55:29Z
dc.date.issued 2022
dc.identifier.other http://purl.lib.ua.edu/186556
dc.identifier.other u0015_0000001_0004515
dc.identifier.other Yoder_alatus_0004D_14988
dc.identifier.uri https://ir.ua.edu/handle/123456789/9542
dc.description Electronic Thesis or Dissertation
dc.description.abstract High-intensity interval training (HIIT) is an effective form of exercise; however, it remains unclear how heat stress, exercise intensity prescription, and recovery mode influence work rate adjustments, thermal and cardiovascular strain, and maximal aerobic capacity (V̇O2max). Three studies investigated these outcomes between the first and fifth round of HIIT (8-min warm-up and rounds of 4-min work×3-min recovery). V̇O2max was measured on separate occasions after the first and final round of HIIT. In Study 1, HIIT was completed in hot (35 °C) and temperate (22 °C) environments using target heart rate (THR) [warm-up and recovery=70% maximal heart rate (HRmax), work=90% HRmax]. To maintain target intensity, considerable decreases in work rate occurred in both conditions, but they were nearly twice as large in the heat, accompanied by elevated recovery HR, higher mean skin temperature, and greater increases in rectal temperature. Following the final round of HIIT, V̇O2max decreased marginally. In Study 2, the HIIT workout was completed in 35 °C at the same THR as Study 1 or a target rating of perceived exertion (RPE) (warm-up and recovery=RPE of 12, work=RPE of 17). To maintain target intensity, work rate decreased 46 W and 30 W in the HR- and RPE-based trials, respectively. Thermal strain was similar between conditions, but elevated cardiovascular strain during RPE-based HIIT corresponded to a larger decrease (15.6%) in V̇O2max compared to HR-based HIIT (6.5%). In Study 3, the HIIT workout occurred in 35 °C and included work at RPE=17 and passive (rest) or active recovery (RPE=12). Thermal strain was similar, but active recovery increased cardiovascular strain and resulted in a larger percent decrease in work rate. V̇O2max declined 11.5% between the first and fifth work intervals regardless of recovery mode. These studies demonstrated all variations of HIIT necessitated meaningful reductions in work rate over time except HIIT based on RPE with passive recovery. Participants ranged from low fit to high fit, but all completed the HIIT sessions. Nonetheless, work rate adjustments and thermal and cardiovascular strain were dependent on the method of exercise intensity prescription and recovery mode and should be considered when prescribing HIIT in the heat.
dc.format.medium electronic
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf
dc.language English
dc.language.iso en_US
dc.publisher University of Alabama Libraries
dc.relation.ispartof The University of Alabama Electronic Theses and Dissertations
dc.relation.ispartof The University of Alabama Libraries Digital Collections
dc.relation.hasversion born digital
dc.rights All rights reserved by the author unless otherwise indicated.
dc.subject.other exercise prescription
dc.subject.other heat stress
dc.subject.other high-intensity interval training
dc.title High-Intensity Interval Training in the Heat
dc.type thesis
dc.type text
etdms.degree.department University of Alabama. Department of Kinesiology
etdms.degree.discipline Kinesiology
etdms.degree.grantor The University of Alabama
etdms.degree.level doctoral
etdms.degree.name Ph.D.

Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


My Account