Public perception and comprehension of the extended forecast graphic in television weather broadcasts

Show simple item record

dc.contributor Keellings, David J.
dc.contributor Myers, Laura
dc.contributor.advisor Senkbeil, Jason C.
dc.contributor.author Reed, Jacob Ryan
dc.date.accessioned 2020-01-16T15:03:56Z
dc.date.available 2020-01-16T15:03:56Z
dc.date.issued 2019
dc.identifier.other u0015_0000001_0003443
dc.identifier.other Reed_alatus_0004M_13909
dc.identifier.uri http://ir.ua.edu/handle/123456789/6500
dc.description Electronic Thesis or Dissertation
dc.description.abstract There have been multiple efforts in recent years to simplify visual weather forecast products, with the goal of more efficient risk communication for the general public. Many meteorological forecast products, such as the cone of uncertainty, storm surge graphics, warning polygons, and SPC convective outlooks, have created varying levels of public confusion resulting in revisions, modifications, and improvements. However, the perception and comprehension of private weather graphics produced by television stations has been largely overlooked. The goal of this study is to explore how the extended forecast graphic (EFG), more commonly known as the 7-day, 10-day, etc., is utilized by broadcasters and understood by the public. Data were gathered from two surveys of the general public and one survey of broadcast meteorologists. Results suggest this graphic is a source of confusion and highlights a disconnect between the meteorologists producing the graphic and the content prioritized by their audiences. Specifically, timing and intensity of any precipitation or adverse weather events are the two most important variables to consider from the viewpoint of the public. These variables are generally absent from the extended forecast graphic, thus forcing the public to draw their own conclusions which may differ from what the meteorologist intends to convey. The placement of forecast high and low temperatures, use of probability of precipitation, icon inconsistency, and length of time the graphic is shown may also contribute to public confusion and misunderstanding. Four alternative EFGs are evaluated in this research, and it is found that showing fewer days on the EFG and removing PoP information can increase the usefulness of the EFG and reduce confusion created by the graphic, without lessening the graphic’s likeability.
dc.format.extent 69 p.
dc.format.medium electronic
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf
dc.language English
dc.language.iso en_US
dc.publisher University of Alabama Libraries
dc.relation.ispartof The University of Alabama Electronic Theses and Dissertations
dc.relation.ispartof The University of Alabama Libraries Digital Collections
dc.relation.hasversion born digital
dc.rights All rights reserved by the author unless otherwise indicated.
dc.subject.other Geography
dc.subject.other Geographic information science and geodesy
dc.title Public perception and comprehension of the extended forecast graphic in television weather broadcasts
dc.type thesis
dc.type text
etdms.degree.department University of Alabama. Department of Geography
etdms.degree.discipline Geography
etdms.degree.grantor The University of Alabama
etdms.degree.level master's
etdms.degree.name M.S.


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Browse

My Account