Intuition in the context of revelation: a biofunctional approach

Show simple item record

dc.contributor Houser, Rick
dc.contributor Kuntz, Aaron M.
dc.contributor Posner, Michael I.
dc.contributor Roskos-Ewoldsen, Beverly
dc.contributor Tomek, Sara
dc.contributor.advisor Iran-Nejad, Asghar
dc.contributor.author Bordbar, Fareed
dc.date.accessioned 2018-07-11T16:49:41Z
dc.date.available 2018-07-11T16:49:41Z
dc.date.issued 2018
dc.identifier.other u0015_0000001_0002993
dc.identifier.other Bordbar_alatus_0004D_13489
dc.identifier.uri http://ir.ua.edu/handle/123456789/3678
dc.description Electronic Thesis or Dissertation
dc.description.abstract Research on intuition is known for its numerous conceptualizations of intuition construct proposed by various theoretical camps for more than a century. In addition to this absence of a consensus over the definition, almost none of the many instruments developed over the years have been successful in measuring intuition especially in light of the findings of recent interdisciplinary research regarding crucial aspects of intuitive behavior. This is mainly because processes underlying intuitive decisions elude conscious awareness and therefore, remain unidentifiable. This elusiveness has in turn resulted in theories basing their objective measurement efforts on what intuition is not rather than what it is. This dissertation is an attempt to address this theoretical/conceptual problem by conducting three studies . The first two are replication studies of two well-cited instruments, the waterloo gestalt closure task (WGCT) and the rational-experiential inventory (REI). Aside from popularity, the mainstream theoretical framework on which they are based – dual-system theories of mind – was pivotal in their selection for replication. In the third theoretical study, attempts were made to address the issues revealed by the two empirical studies by analyzing the nature of responses and the overall factor structure of subjects’ data collected by both measures. The results revealed that the wholetheme spiral of biofunctional understanding presents itself to be a fit model for the data, explaining a significant proportion of variation especially when it comes to subjects’ intuitive performance on both WGCT and REI. At the end, implications offered by the biofunctional theory of intuitive understanding as a unifying and comprehensive theoretical framework for research on intuition are discussed, particularly as it relates to the discipline of educational psychology. Key Words: Intuition, Disembodied information processing, Waterloo gestalt closure task, Dual-process theories, Rational-experiential inventory, Conceptual understanding, Biofunctional understanding, Knowing-by-revelation, Understanding-by-reflection, Intuitive understanding, Iran-Nejad's wholetheme spiral of biofunctional understanding, Biofunctional model of intuition.
dc.format.extent 119 p.
dc.format.medium electronic
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf
dc.language English
dc.language.iso en_US
dc.publisher University of Alabama Libraries
dc.relation.ispartof The University of Alabama Electronic Theses and Dissertations
dc.relation.ispartof The University of Alabama Libraries Digital Collections
dc.relation.hasversion born digital
dc.rights All rights reserved by the author unless otherwise indicated.
dc.subject.other Educational psychology
dc.subject.other Psychology
dc.subject.other Education
dc.title Intuition in the context of revelation: a biofunctional approach
dc.type thesis
dc.type text
etdms.degree.department University of Alabama. Dept. of Educational Studies in Psychology, Research Methodology, and Counseling
etdms.degree.discipline Educational Psychology (General Educational Psychology)
etdms.degree.grantor The University of Alabama
etdms.degree.level doctoral
etdms.degree.name Ph.D.


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Browse

My Account