Disparities in syringe exchange program efficacy in urban and rural environments

Show simple item record

dc.contributor Caillier, James G.
dc.contributor Kirkpatrick, Billy
dc.contributor.advisor Fording, Richard C.
dc.contributor.author McCan, Zachary Hardister
dc.date.accessioned 2018-01-19T19:37:34Z
dc.date.available 2018-01-19T19:37:34Z
dc.date.issued 2017
dc.identifier.other u0015_0000001_0002696
dc.identifier.other McCan_alatus_0004M_13187
dc.identifier.uri http://ir.ua.edu/handle/123456789/3334
dc.description Electronic Thesis or Dissertation
dc.description.abstract Policies intended to reduce the harm caused by substance abuse in the United States have been shown to have positive results in reducing the rates of communicable diseases and overdose related deaths in communities that have chosen to implement such policies. Specifically, syringe exchange programs have been shown to reduce the rates of HIV/AIDS in cities and counties that have them. Currently, most syringe exchange programs are in large cities leaving hard hit rural communities to suffer with the effects of HIV/AIDS with fewer resources than their urban counterparts. When syringe exchanges are in rural areas, a combination of proximity to the programs, stigmatization, policing policy, and other environmental factors reduce the ability for syringe exchange programs to operate at their maximum level of effectiveness. It is important to understand exactly what the disparity in efficacy in syringe exchange programs in urban and rural environments is, and what causes it so that local, state, and federal policymakers can work to tailor programs and policies to rural communities. This study uses fixed effects and interactive models to analyze time series panel data to test the effect of syringe exchanges in urban and rural contexts. The data was collected primarily from census data, but an independent measure of social capital is also used, as well as information from nonprofit groups such as the Foundation for Aids Research, and the North American Syringe Exchange network. The fixed effects model control for homogeneity in counties over time, and additional control variables include if a county is in a Medicaid expansion state, health insurance rates, and the presence of a syringe exchange program in a county. Using this data, I find that as rurality increases, syringe exchange programs are less effective, per the hypothesis, alongside several other findings. This research suggests that governments would be wise to both increase syringe exchange program coverage, especially in rural areas, and implement mobile syringe fleets.
dc.format.extent 75 p.
dc.format.medium electronic
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf
dc.language English
dc.language.iso en_US
dc.publisher University of Alabama Libraries
dc.relation.ispartof The University of Alabama Electronic Theses and Dissertations
dc.relation.ispartof The University of Alabama Libraries Digital Collections
dc.relation.hasversion born digital
dc.rights All rights reserved by the author unless otherwise indicated.
dc.subject.other Public policy
dc.title Disparities in syringe exchange program efficacy in urban and rural environments
dc.type thesis
dc.type text
etdms.degree.department University of Alabama. Dept. of Political Science
etdms.degree.discipline Political Science
etdms.degree.grantor The University of Alabama
etdms.degree.name M.P.A.


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Browse

My Account