Structural validity and reliability of two observation protocols in college mathematics

Show simple item record

dc.contributor Chen, Yuhui
dc.contributor Cruz-Uribe, David V.
dc.contributor Moen, Kabe
dc.contributor Zelkowski, Jeremy S.
dc.contributor.advisor Gleason, Jim
dc.contributor.author Watley, Laura Erin
dc.contributor.other University of Alabama Tuscaloosa
dc.date.accessioned 2017-07-28T14:12:28Z
dc.date.available 2017-07-28T14:12:28Z
dc.date.issued 2017
dc.identifier.other u0015_0000001_0002645
dc.identifier.other Watley_alatus_0004D_13086
dc.identifier.uri http://ir.ua.edu/handle/123456789/3241
dc.description Electronic Thesis or Dissertation en_US
dc.description.abstract Undergraduate mathematics education is being challenged to improve, with peer evaluation, student evaluations, and portfolio assessments as the primary methods of formative and summative assessment used by instructors. Observation protocols like the Mathematics Classroom Observation Protocol for Practices (MCOP^2) and the abbreviated Reformed Teaching Observation Protocol (aRTOP) are another alternative. However, before these observation protocols can be used in the classroom with confidence, a study needed to be conducted to examine both the aRTOP and the MCOP^2. This study was conducted at three large doctorate-granting universities and eight masters and baccalaureate institutions. Both the aRTOP and the MCOP^2 were evaluated in 110 classroom observations during the Spring 2016, Fall 2016, and Spring 2017 semesters. The data analysis allowed conclusions regarding the internal structure, internal reliability, and relationship between the constructs measured by both observation protocols. The factor loadings and fit indices produced from a Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) found a stronger internal structure of the MCOP^2. Cronbach's alpha was also calculated to analyze the internal reliability for each subscale of both protocols. All alphas were in the satisfactory range for the MCOP^2 and below the satisfactory range for the aRTOP. Linear Regression analysis was also conducted to estimate the relationship between the constructs of both protocols. We found a positive and strong correlation between each pair of constructs with a higher correlation between subscales that do not contain Content Propositional Knowledge. This leads us to believe that Content Propositional Knowledge of the aRTOP is measuring something completely different, but not very well, and it needs to be assessed using another method. As noted above and detailed in the body of the work, we find support for the Mathematics Classroom Observation Protocol for Practices (MCOP^2) as a useful assessment tool for undergraduate mathematics classrooms. en_US
dc.format.extent 117 p.
dc.format.medium electronic
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf
dc.language English
dc.language.iso en_US
dc.publisher University of Alabama Libraries
dc.relation.ispartof The University of Alabama Electronic Theses and Dissertations
dc.relation.ispartof The University of Alabama Libraries Digital Collections
dc.relation.hasversion born digital
dc.rights All rights reserved by the author unless otherwise indicated. en_US
dc.subject Mathematics
dc.subject Mathematics education
dc.subject Applied mathematics
dc.title Structural validity and reliability of two observation protocols in college mathematics en_US
dc.type thesis
dc.type text
etdms.degree.department University of Alabama. Department of Mathematics
etdms.degree.discipline Mathematics
etdms.degree.grantor The University of Alabama
etdms.degree.level doctoral
etdms.degree.name Ph.D.


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Browse

My Account