Bruises without a name: investigating college student perceptions of relationship violence terminology

Show simple item record

dc.contributor Witte, Tricia H.
dc.contributor Pederson, Joshua R.
dc.contributor Hoewe, Jennifer
dc.contributor.advisor Mills, Carol B.
dc.contributor.author Nordin, Karin
dc.date.accessioned 2017-07-28T14:12:18Z
dc.date.available 2017-07-28T14:12:18Z
dc.date.issued 2017
dc.identifier.other u0015_0000001_0002628
dc.identifier.other Nordin_alatus_0004M_13122
dc.identifier.uri http://ir.ua.edu/handle/123456789/3225
dc.description Electronic Thesis or Dissertation
dc.description.abstract Rates of collegiate relationship violence are at an all-time high (Breiding, 2015). Although colleges and universities are taking steps towards reducing these rates, recent research has uncovered a fatal flaw in their methods: terminology. Lederman and Stewart (2003) surveyed relationship violence prevention campaigns across college campuses, finding ‘domestic violence’ as the most widely used name for collegiate relationship violence, yet also the one college students were least comfortable with using. 298 students at a large, southeastern university completed a survey through the online distribution tool Qualtrics. Using a basic 1-7 Likert Scale, students were asked to rate the appropriateness of the following terms: domestic violence, dating violence, dating abuse, intimate partner violence, intimate terrorism, and common couple violence. Findings indicate that students were significantly more likely to attribute the terms domestic violence, dating violence, and dating abuse to a situation if the perpetrator of violence was male rather than female. When partners were dating, students felt most comfortable with the terms ‘dating violence’ and ‘dating abuse.’ Most importantly, terminology was found to be correlated with perceptions of severity, blame, and recommendations for bystander action. Ultimately, this study suggests that schemas surround each possible relationship violence term, and offers the idea that simply adjusting what college student deem as ‘domestic violence’ could unlock the key to bystander intervention efforts and violence reduction in the future.
dc.format.extent 72 p.
dc.format.medium electronic
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf
dc.language English
dc.language.iso en_US
dc.publisher University of Alabama Libraries
dc.relation.ispartof The University of Alabama Electronic Theses and Dissertations
dc.relation.ispartof The University of Alabama Libraries Digital Collections
dc.relation.hasversion born digital
dc.rights All rights reserved by the author unless otherwise indicated.
dc.subject.other Communication
dc.title Bruises without a name: investigating college student perceptions of relationship violence terminology
dc.type thesis
dc.type text
etdms.degree.department University of Alabama. Dept. of Communication Studies
etdms.degree.discipline Communication Studies
etdms.degree.grantor The University of Alabama
etdms.degree.level master's
etdms.degree.name M.A.


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Browse

My Account