Aggravating, ambiguous, and arbitrary: perceptions of heinousness in capital punishment

Show simple item record

dc.contributor Hart, William P.
dc.contributor Sogol, Joel L.
dc.contributor.advisor Salekin, Karen L. Applegate, Kathryn Christine 2017-04-26T14:25:43Z 2017-04-26T14:25:43Z 2016
dc.identifier.other u0015_0000001_0002343
dc.identifier.other Applegate_alatus_0004M_12815
dc.description Electronic Thesis or Dissertation
dc.description.abstract Of the 32 states with the death penalty, 25 states identify some variation of “heinous, atrocious, or cruel” as a statutory aggravating factor. In recognition of the vague nature of this factor, some states have enacted legislation that limits jurors’ discretion by providing guidance regarding how to define “heinousness,” or by outlining essential characteristics of heinous crimes. Despite this guidance, indiscriminate application is still a concern. Research has explored how heinousness affects juror decision-making, sentencing outcomes, and perceptions of the defendant; however, these studies have varied in their definitions and have not always ensured that perceptions of heinousness were different across conditions. The purpose of the current study was to better understand what elements of crimes are viewed as more or less heinous in the eyes of undergraduate mock jurors. Using a within-subject, vignette-based design, ratings of heinousness were collected for 53 vignettes and eight variables were studied (i.e., method of killing, relationship, victim age, victim vulnerability, mental suffering, physical suffering, gruesomeness, and time). Significant differences were found within each factor (p < .001). Results provide researchers with a framework for future heinousness research, as well as information for the legal system with regard to what constitutes heinousness.
dc.format.extent 140 p.
dc.format.medium electronic
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf
dc.language English
dc.language.iso en_US
dc.publisher University of Alabama Libraries
dc.relation.ispartof The University of Alabama Electronic Theses and Dissertations
dc.relation.ispartof The University of Alabama Libraries Digital Collections
dc.relation.hasversion born digital
dc.rights All rights reserved by the author unless otherwise indicated.
dc.subject.other Psychobiology
dc.subject.other Criminology
dc.subject.other Law
dc.title Aggravating, ambiguous, and arbitrary: perceptions of heinousness in capital punishment
dc.type thesis
dc.type text University of Alabama. Dept. of Psychology Psychology The University of Alabama master's M.A.

Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


My Account