Rock climbing training techniques, reliability, and recovery in weight-assisted pull-ups

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Date
2010
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
University of Alabama Libraries
Abstract

Three studies were conducted on rock climbing. Study one investigated common rock climbing training techniques among competitive rock climbers via a questionnaire. Study two evaluated the reliability of open-handed and pinch grip weight-assisted pull-ups and whether chalk improved pull-up performance. Study three investigated two different recovery modalities, concerning closed-handed and open-handed weight-assisted pull-up performance, both of which are important abilities for rock climbers. The frequency of rock climbing training techniques (RCTT) as part of study one, was also investigated in competitive rock climbers (n = 174 usable). Chi square analyses revealed differences among age groups and three questions; differences also existed between gender and seven questions. Principal component analysis revealed five factors which explained 62% of the variance in questionnaire variability. Factor one, the primary RCTT, explained 25% of the variance in questionnaire variability. Some of the primary RCTT included: performing pull-ups, dead hangs, and utilizing various rock climbing training equipment such as fingerboards, campus boards and rock rings. While factors two, three and four pertained to climbing, explained 30% of the variance. The remaining 7% of the variance was explained by factor five, training from various structures. During study two (the reliability study) nine recreationally active male climbers performed six counterbalanced trials of open-handed and pinch grip weight-assisted pull-ups to failure with 72 hours of recovery. In four trials, the climbers used chalk during open-handed and pinch grip weight assisted pull-ups, but the remaining two trials, were without chalk. These additional trials allowed for the evaluation of the contribution of chalk to open-handed and pinch grip weight-assisted pull-up performance. Climbers were assisted 50% of body weight for the open-handed and pinch grip pull-ups. No significant differences were found between the open-handed vs. pinch grip or chalked vs. no chalked trials for rating of perceived exertion (RPE), heart rate (HR), perceived recovery scale (PRS) and session-RPE (S-RPE). Intraclass Rs for test-retest of the open-handed and pinch grip weight-assisted pull-ups were 0.99 and 0.96, respectively. However, Bland-Altman analysis revealed large errors indicating weight-assisted pull-ups using open-handed (95% error range: upper limit 6.34, lower limit -3.90) and pinch grips (95% error range: upper limit 5.35, lower limit -6.91) were only somewhat reliable. Chalk improved performance in both open-handed (mean=22.8 ± 4.53 vs. mean no chalk = 19.7 ± 4.39 reps; p = 0.006) and pinch grip (mean = 14.4 ± 4.47 vs. mean no chalk = 9.1 ± 4.83 reps; p = 0.007) weight-assisted pull-ups when compared to the non-chalked trials. In the third study, (recovery), each participant performed four counterbalanced trials of closed-handed and open-handed weight-assisted pull ups to failure after 72 hours of recovery. For each trial, participants performed three sets to failure of weight-assisted pull-ups using either the closed-handed or open-handed grip assisted 50% of body weight. Treatments were ~ 20 minutes of passive recovery or ice bags applied, between pull-up sets, to the upper-arm, immediately distal to the shoulder. No differences were found pre- to post- treatments for hand-grip strength, HR, RPE, PRS, and S-RPE or comfort scales among trials. Participants completed significantly fewer open-handed pull-ups (p = 0.003) than closed-handed pull-ups. Ice bag recovery maintained (p= 0.001) subsequent open-handed pull-up performance for sets two and three when compared to passive recovery. For closed-handed pull-ups, no differences (p = 0.31) were found between ice bag and passive recovery. Overall, results suggest pulling and hanging movements using sport-specific equipment predominate as a primary RCTT. Both the open-handed and pinch grip weight-assisted pull-ups were found to be somewhat reliable, while using chalk with these grips improved weight-assisted pull-up performance. Compared to passive recovery, ice bags were found to be superior for open-handed but not closed-handed pull-ups.

Description
Electronic Thesis or Dissertation
Keywords
Kinesiology
Citation