Research and Publications - Department of Information Systems, Statistics & Management Science

Permanent URI for this collection

https://ir.ua.edu/handle/123456789/2859

Browse

Recent Submissions

Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Effective screening strategies for safe opening of universities under Omicron and Delta variants of COVID-19
    (Nature Portfolio, 2022) Rabil, Marie Jeanne; Tunc, Sait; Bish, Douglas R.; Bish, Ebru K.; Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State University; University of Alabama Tuscaloosa
    As new COVID-19 variants emerge, and disease and population characteristics change, screening strategies may also need to change. We develop a decision-making model that can assist a college to determine an optimal screening strategy based on their characteristics and resources, considering COVID-19 infections/hospitalizations/deaths; peak daily hospitalizations; and the tests required. We also use this tool to generate screening guidelines for the safe opening of college campuses. Our compartmental model simulates disease spread on a hypothetical college campus under co-circulating variants with different disease dynamics, considering: (i) the heterogeneity in disease transmission and outcomes for faculty/staff and students based on vaccination status and level of natural immunity; and (ii) variant- and dose-dependent vaccine efficacy. Using the Spring 2022 academic semester as a case study, we study routine screening strategies, and find that screening the faculty/staff less frequently than the students, and/or the boosted and vaccinated less frequently than the unvaccinated, may avert a higher number of infections per test, compared to universal screening of the entire population at a common frequency. We also discuss key policy issues, including the need to revisit the mitigation objective over time, effective strategies that are informed by booster coverage, and if and when screening alone can compensate for low booster coverage.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Benefits of integrated screening and vaccination for infection control
    (PLOS, 2022) Rabil, Marie Jeanne; Tunc, Sait; Bish, Douglas R.; Bish, Ebru K.; Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State University; University of Alabama Tuscaloosa
    ImportanceScreening and vaccination are essential in the fight against infectious diseases, but need to be integrated and customized based on community and disease characteristics. ObjectiveTo develop effective screening and vaccination strategies, customized for a college campus, to reduce COVID-19 infections, hospitalizations, deaths, and peak hospitalizations. Design, setting, and participantsWe construct a compartmental model of disease spread under vaccination and routine screening, and study the efficacy of four mitigation strategies (routine screening only, vaccination only, vaccination with partial or full routine screening), and a no-intervention strategy. The study setting is a hypothetical college campus of 5,000 students and 455 faculty members during the Fall 2021 academic semester, when the Delta variant was the predominant strain. For sensitivity analysis, we vary the screening frequency, daily vaccination rate, initial vaccine coverage, and screening and vaccination compliance; and consider scenarios that represent low/medium/high transmission and test efficacy. Model parameters come from publicly available or published sources. ResultsWith low initial vaccine coverage (30% in our study), even aggressive vaccination and screening result in a high number of infections: 1,020 to 2,040 (1,530 to 2,480) with routine daily (every other day) screening of the unvaccinated; 280 to 900 with daily screening extended to the newly vaccinated in base- and worst-case scenarios, which respectively consider reproduction numbers of 4.75 and 6.75 for the Delta variant. ConclusionIntegrated vaccination and routine screening can allow for a safe opening of a college when both the vaccine effectiveness and the initial vaccine coverage are sufficiently high. The interventions need to be customized considering the initial vaccine coverage, estimated compliance, screening and vaccination capacity, disease transmission and adverse outcome rates, and the number of infections/peak hospitalizations the college is willing to tolerate.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Phase II control charts for monitoring dispersion when parameters are estimated
    (Taylor & Francis, 2017) Diko, M. D.; Goedhart, R.; Chakraborti, S.; Does, R. J. M. M.; Epprecht, E. K.; University of Amsterdam; University of Alabama Tuscaloosa; Pontificia Universidade Catolica do Rio de Janeiro
    Shewhart control charts are among the most popular control charts used to monitor process dispersion. To base these control charts on the assumption of known in-control process parameters is often unrealistic. In practice, estimates are used to construct the control charts and this has substantial consequences for the in-control and out-of-control chart performance. The effects are especially severe when the number of Phase I subgroups used to estimate the unknown process dispersion is small. Typically, recommendations are to use around 30 subgroups of size 5 each.We derive and tabulate new corrected charting constants that should be used to construct the estimated probability limits of the Phase II Shewhart dispersion (e.g., range and standard deviation) control charts for a given number of Phase I subgroups, subgroup size and nominal in-control average run-length (ICARL). These control limits account for the effects of parameter estimation. Two approaches are used to find the new charting constants, a numerical and an analytic approach, which give similar results. It is seen that the corrected probability limits based charts achieve the desired nominal ICARL performance, but the out-of-control average run-length performance deteriorate when both the size of the shift and the number of Phase I subgroups are small. This is the price one must pay while accounting for the effects of parameter estimation so that the in-control performance is as advertised. An illustration using real-life data is provided along with a summary and recommendations.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Shewhart control charts for dispersion adjusted for parameter estimation
    (Taylor & Francis, 2017) Goedhart, Rob; da Silva, Michele M.; Schoonhoven, Marit; Epprecht, Eugenio K.; Chakraborti, Subha; Does, Ronald J. M. M.; Veiga, Alvaro; University of Amsterdam; Pontificia Universidade Catolica do Rio de Janeiro; University of Alabama Tuscaloosa
    Several recent studies have shown that the number of Phase I samples required for a Phase II control chart with estimated parameters to perform properly may be prohibitively high. Looking for a more practical alternative, adjusting the control limits has been considered in the literature. We consider this problem for the classic Shewhart charts for process dispersion under normality and present an analytical method to determine the adjusted control limits. Furthermore, we examine the performance of the resulting chart at signaling increases in the process dispersion. The proposed adjustment ensures that a minimum in-control performance of the control chart is guaranteed with a specified probability. This performance is indicated in terms of the false alarm rate or, equivalently, the in-control average run length. We also discuss the tradeoff between the in-control and out-of-control performance. Since our adjustment is based on exact analytical derivations, the recently suggested bootstrapmethod is no longer necessary. A real-life example is provided in order to illustrate the proposed methodology.