Real-scene contextual cueing: why trees are better than cats

Show simple item record

dc.contributor Merrill, Edward C.
dc.contributor Black, Sheila R.
dc.contributor Jarrett, Matthew A.
dc.contributor Robinson, Cecil D.
dc.contributor Roskos-Ewoldsen, Beverly
dc.contributor.advisor Merrill, Edward C. Scrivner-Limbaugh, Allison L. Thomas
dc.contributor.other University of Alabama Tuscaloosa 2017-03-01T17:39:06Z 2017-03-01T17:39:06Z 2015
dc.identifier.other u0015_0000001_0002185
dc.identifier.other ScrivnerLimbaugh_alatus_0004D_12539
dc.description Electronic Thesis or Dissertation en_US
dc.description.abstract This dissertation was designed to study the impact of stable and unstable landmarks on repeated visual search tasks involving real-scene displays relative to no background displays in a contextual cueing procedure. Contextual cueing, a repeated visual search task, involves implicit learning through associative relationships between a set of distractors and a target location (Chun and Jiang, 1998). Stable landmarks, defined as unmoving, reliable landmarks were items like benches, road signs, and a large fountain. Unstable items, defined as capable of movement and therefore unreliable landmarks, consisted of a cat, people, and other animals. Typically contextual cueing tasks involve repeated exposures to a set of displays over several blocks in the learning phase. In a test phase, participants encounter unseen displays with random target locations. The current study involved two experiments. Experiment 1 contained real-scene displays where participants searched similar park scenes for a predetermined target amongst stable and unstable distractors. In the test phase, the stable distractors were removed in one condition, and in another, only the unstable distractors were removed. Experiment 2 was identical, although there were no real-scene backgrounds. It was predicted that participants would respond faster to the stable condition, where stable landmarks would help to predict the location of the target. The general hypothesis was that inherent stable objects such water fountains, benches, and road signs would be more informative about the location of other objects in a scene than would relative unstable objects that could move to different locations or completely out of the scene on their own such as animals or people. Overall, there was a difference in the degree to which stable and unstable objects influence performance to repeated relative to novel displays. In fact, this difference was observed for stable vs unstable objects encountered in real world scenes and those presented against a solid background. As such, the difference in the processing of stable vs unstable objects in real world scenes was reflected in a greater cost when unstable objects were removed during the test phase relative to when stable objects were removed. Overall the results indicate that participants struggle with repeated search tasks within real scenes. en_US
dc.format.extent 64 p.
dc.format.medium electronic
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf
dc.language English
dc.language.iso en_US
dc.publisher University of Alabama Libraries
dc.relation.ispartof The University of Alabama Electronic Theses and Dissertations
dc.relation.ispartof The University of Alabama Libraries Digital Collections
dc.relation.hasversion born digital
dc.rights All rights reserved by the author unless otherwise indicated. en_US
dc.subject Psychology
dc.subject Cognitive psychology
dc.title Real-scene contextual cueing: why trees are better than cats en_US
dc.type thesis
dc.type text University of Alabama. Department of Psychology Psychology The University of Alabama doctoral Ph.D.

Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


My Account