A strategy for materials price risk mitigation

Show simple item record

dc.contributor Grau, David
dc.contributor Midkiff, K. Clark
dc.contributor Moynihan, Gary P.
dc.contributor Richardson, James A.
dc.contributor.advisor Back, W. Edward
dc.contributor.author Macdonald, Rebecca N.
dc.date.accessioned 2017-03-01T16:48:23Z
dc.date.available 2017-03-01T16:48:23Z
dc.date.issued 2013
dc.identifier.other u0015_0000001_0001283
dc.identifier.other Macdonald_alatus_0004D_11568
dc.identifier.uri https://ir.ua.edu/handle/123456789/1753
dc.description Electronic Thesis or Dissertation
dc.description.abstract Construction projects are too commonly over budget and regularly contend with extreme fluctuations with regard to strategic materials pricing. The engineering and construction (E&C) industry continues to struggle with effective cost control techniques and is in need of new tools and/or strategies to successfully address these mounting issues. A research study was undertaken for construction projects, inclusive of any delivery type, scale, or location, to identify existing strategies currently in use by the E&C industry as well as other industries. A historical markup or price escalator for contingencies is not a universal solution for current and future market volatility. Their use was found to be inadequate 40% of the time. An opportunity exists for the E&C industry to adopt established strategies currently in use by other industries to improve project performance. A model for materials price risk mitigation for particular use in the E&C industry was developed and proposed. Using real-world projects the model is exercised to verify the positive, mitigating impact of derivative usage. The findings are that financial tools used by other industries are not only applicable in the construction industry but unique in project specific application. Hedging, in particular, was found to be effective more than 70% of the time. More specifically, hedging diminishes steel pricing escalation by 21% compared to non-hedging. With the steel market still in its infancy, the growth potential is vast. Other financial instruments and commodity markets should also be analyzed for applicable benefit to the construction industry. Best practices for installing organizational structure and processes for executing the model could be determined. Possible limitations are the lack of transparency in certain market structures and implementation costs. Ultimately, a better informed and more financially savvy E&C industry will emerge.
dc.format.extent 166 p.
dc.format.medium electronic
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf
dc.language English
dc.language.iso en_US
dc.publisher University of Alabama Libraries
dc.relation.ispartof The University of Alabama Electronic Theses and Dissertations
dc.relation.ispartof The University of Alabama Libraries Digital Collections
dc.relation.hasversion born digital
dc.rights All rights reserved by the author unless otherwise indicated.
dc.subject.other Civil engineering
dc.title A strategy for materials price risk mitigation
dc.type thesis
dc.type text
etdms.degree.department University of Alabama. Dept. of Civil, Construction, and Environmental Engineering
etdms.degree.discipline Civil, Construction & Environmental Engineering
etdms.degree.grantor The University of Alabama
etdms.degree.level doctoral
etdms.degree.name Ph.D.

Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


My Account