Hegemonic masculinity and sexual stereotyping in physical education

Show simple item record

dc.contributor Hardin, L. Brent
dc.contributor Robinson, Cecil D.
dc.contributor Sinelnikov, Oleg A.
dc.contributor Stran, Margaret E.
dc.contributor.advisor Curtner-Smith, Matthew
dc.contributor.author Chen, YuChun
dc.date.accessioned 2017-03-01T16:34:06Z
dc.date.available 2017-03-01T16:34:06Z
dc.date.issued 2012
dc.identifier.other u0015_0000001_0000980
dc.identifier.other Chen_alatus_0004D_11193
dc.identifier.uri https://ir.ua.edu/handle/123456789/1467
dc.description Electronic Thesis or Dissertation
dc.description.abstract Previous research has indicated that the preservice teachers (PTs) with coaching orientations reinforced sexism and masculine bias while employing the sport education (SE) model. The first study examined the degree to which SE delivered by two PTs with teaching orientations combatted or reinforced sexism and masculine bias in four SE seasons. Guided by the theory of hegemonic masculinity (HM), findings revealed that sexism and masculine bias were largely combatted and that the PTs provided a relatively equitable experience for girls and smaller, less physically able boys. Key reasons for this success included PTs' liberal views about sport, their willingness to confront the prevailing sporting culture, and the fact that they taught elementary-aged children. With the intention to integrate the two previous studies, the theory of HM was employed in the second study examining four SE seasons taught by two experienced inservice teachers for the presence or absence of sexism and masculine bias. The inservice teachers were found able to combat the effects of HM to a greater extent than teaching-oriented PTs. Their effectiveness was attributed to their liberal beliefs about sport and gender and teaching orientations. Additionally, the teachers were able to provide a relatively equitable experience for girls and smaller, less physically able boys because they possessed good levels of curricular, pedagogical, content, and pedagogical content knowledge as well as superior knowledge of their pupils. The HM perspective also suggests that any contradicting masculinities are discredited by the dominant form. Similar to males who do not behave in accepted masculine ways might be marginalized as being "feminine," homosexual traits might be marginalized relative to those considered heterosexual. Therefore, the third study examined the influence of sexual identity stereotyping (SIS) on five heterosexual female physical education (PE) PTs. Results indicated that the PTs generally had a good understanding of SIS and that four of them had encountered it although only one had been sexually stereotyped herself. Grounded theory, in the form of five hypotheses, was developed to explain the influence of SIS on heterosexual female PE PTs and neophyte female PE teachers.
dc.format.extent 117 p.
dc.format.medium electronic
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf
dc.language English
dc.language.iso en_US
dc.publisher University of Alabama Libraries
dc.relation.ispartof The University of Alabama Electronic Theses and Dissertations
dc.relation.ispartof The University of Alabama Libraries Digital Collections
dc.relation.hasversion born digital
dc.rights All rights reserved by the author unless otherwise indicated.
dc.subject.other Physical education
dc.subject.other Teacher education
dc.subject.other Gender studies
dc.title Hegemonic masculinity and sexual stereotyping in physical education
dc.type thesis
dc.type text
etdms.degree.department University of Alabama. Dept. of Kinesiology
etdms.degree.discipline Human Performance
etdms.degree.grantor The University of Alabama
etdms.degree.level doctoral
etdms.degree.name Ph.D.


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Browse

My Account