Unloading the hired gun - inoculation effects in expert witness testimony

Show simple item record

dc.contributor Sellbom, Martin
dc.contributor Prohaska, Ariane
dc.contributor Parker, Jeffrey G.
dc.contributor Klinger, Mark R.
dc.contributor.advisor Brodsky, Stanley L.
dc.contributor.author Ziemke, Mitchell H.
dc.date.accessioned 2017-03-01T16:33:57Z
dc.date.available 2017-03-01T16:33:57Z
dc.date.issued 2012
dc.identifier.other u0015_0000001_0000946
dc.identifier.other Ziemke_alatus_0004D_10758
dc.identifier.uri https://ir.ua.edu/handle/123456789/1435
dc.description Electronic Thesis or Dissertation
dc.description.abstract The current projects investigated the efficacy of inoculation as a trial strategy designed to counter mock jurors' perceptions that an expert is a hired gun. Additionally, the projects also examined whether the manner in which experts responded to these questions had a significant effect on their ratings as a hired gun and overall credibility. The project contained two independent studies with parallel manipulations. Study 1 examined the previously mentioned effects in a civil trial while study 2 examined them in a criminal trial. The effects of these variables on measures of case outcome were also examined. Results revealed that, in a civil setting, inoculation significantly affected mock jurors' views of psychology in general, but had no significant effect on ratings of the expert as a hired gun, expert credibility, or case outcome. However, experts who responded to questions about bias in a narrative versus a fragmented manner were viewed as less of a hired gun. These results were not replicated in the criminal context. In that setting, not using inoculation led to higher ratings of expert knowledge. No other significant effects of inoculation or response style were found in the criminal setting. Implications of these results regarding current theory about hired gun expert witnesses are discussed. Additionally, suggestions for the fields of trial strategy and expert witness testimony are made. Finally, due to the context dependent nature of the results that were obtained, these findings suggest that future research in this area should be wary to generalize findings from a civil context to a criminal context and vice versa.
dc.format.extent 203 p.
dc.format.medium electronic
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf
dc.language English
dc.language.iso en_US
dc.publisher University of Alabama Libraries
dc.relation.ispartof The University of Alabama Electronic Theses and Dissertations
dc.relation.ispartof The University of Alabama Libraries Digital Collections
dc.relation.hasversion born digital
dc.rights All rights reserved by the author unless otherwise indicated.
dc.subject.other Psychology
dc.subject.other Law
dc.title Unloading the hired gun - inoculation effects in expert witness testimony
dc.type thesis
dc.type text
etdms.degree.department University of Alabama. Dept. of Psychology
etdms.degree.discipline Psychology
etdms.degree.grantor The University of Alabama
etdms.degree.level doctoral
etdms.degree.name Ph.D.


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Browse

My Account