The University of Alabama
  • Log In
    New user? Click here to register. Have you forgotten your password?
  • About the repository
  • Open Access
  • Research Data Services
  • University Libraries
  • Login
University Libraries
    Communities & Collections
    Explore
  1. Home
  2. Browse by Author

Browsing by Author "Smitherman, Anna"

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Results Per Page
Sort Options
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Development of the composite catastrophizing measure-short form (CCM-SF)
    (University of Alabama Libraries, 2014) Smitherman, Anna; Thorn, Beverly E.; University of Alabama Tuscaloosa
    Pain-related cognitions play an important role in the pain experience. Several different pain cognitions are frequently assessed in both research and clinical evaluation. Among them, pain catastrophizing has been shown to be particularly predictive of a number of pain outcomes. The Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) is the most widely used measure of pain catastrophizing and shows good reliability and validity. However, research suggests that catastrophizing may not be fully captured by the three scales comprising the PCS. The goal of this study was to develop and validate a new measure of pain catastrophizing. The new measure, The Composite Catastrophizing Measure - Short Form (CCM-SF), was developed from data collected on 73 items from the PCS and other related measures (N=220). These items were subjected to factor analyses and 14 were selected to represent two scales: pain preoccupation and pain worry. The new measure was administered to 223 undergraduate students prior to and after a cold pressor task (CPT) to assess both dispositional and situational pain cognitions. The CCM-SF showed good internal consistency for both the dispositional (α=.92) and situational (α=.91) administrations. Correlation analyses showed that both administrations of the CCM-SF were predictive of pain outcomes (pain intensity, unpleasantness, and tolerance) from the experimental pain task. Confirmatory factor analysis indicated that its factor structure remained consistent over time. Analyses also revealed that, when evaluated individually, the pain preoccupation subscale was a better predictor than the pain worry subscale of pain outcomes related to the CPT. It is hypothesized that the pain worry subscale will contribute more to the assessment of clinical pain samples than experimental pain samples. The CCM-SF seems to be psychometrically comparable to current gold standard measurements of pain catastrophizing. Beyond this, the CCM-SF offers unique subscales that allow for the versatile assessment of pain across domains (e.g. experimental, chronic, and acute). Future research should explore the summative and subscale scores from the CCM-SF in clinical samples.
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Psychological predictors of pain responsivity: explaining race and sex differences
    (University of Alabama Libraries, 2012) Smitherman, Anna; Thorn, Beverly E.; University of Alabama Tuscaloosa
    There are many factors used to predict pain responsivity. Both psychological and biological factors have been explored at length. The current study seeks to evaluate the unique and combined predictive power of psychological and biological factors on pain responsivity. The primary aims of this study were to 1) explore the unique contributions of primary appraisals (threat/harm and challenge), pain catastrophizing, and emotional vulnerability alongside race and sex to the pain responsivity, and 2) explore the relations between race and sex with pain responsivity, and determine if an interaction exists. Participants included 199 undergraduate students who completed a cold pressor task (CPT) and a battery of questionnaires. Regression analyses indicated that while primary appraisals, catastrophizing, and emotional vulnerability are unique constructs, pain catastrophizing continues to be the strongest, and often only, predictor of pain responsivity. This remained consistent even with the addition of race and sex to the model. MANOVA showed main effects for both race and sex on pain tolerance but no race by sex interaction emerged. Mediation analyses yielded information about the unique relations between the predictors that is worthy of continued exploration. Findings indicate that catastrophizing is not redundant when related to primary appraisal or personality variables and is a unique and important cognitive construct worthy of specific targeting in treatment.

Fulfill funder &
journal policies

Increase your
reach and impact

Preserve your works

University Libraries
Tel: +1205-348-8647ir@ua.edu
PrivacyDisclaimerAccessibilityCopyright © 2024