Browsing by Author "Pimentel, Camilla B."

Now showing 1 - 5 of 5
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Adaptation of a Nursing Home Culture Change Research Instrument for Frontline Staff Quality Improvement Use
    (American Psychological Association, 2017) Hartmann, Christine W.; Palmer, Jennifer A.; Mills, Whitney L.; Pimentel, Camilla B.; Allen, Rebecca S.; Wewiorski, Nancy J.; Dillon, Kristen R.; Snow, A. Lynn; Boston University; Baylor College of Medicine; University of Massachusetts Amherst; University of Alabama Tuscaloosa
    Enhanced interpersonal relationships and meaningful resident engagement in daily life are central to nursing home cultural transformation, yet these critical components of person-centered care may be difficult for frontline staff to measure using traditional research instruments. To address the need for easy-to-use instruments to help nursing home staff members evaluate and improve person-centered care, the psychometric method of cognitive-based interviewing was used to adapt a structured observation instrument originally developed for researchers and nursing home surveyors. Twenty-eight staff members from 2 Veterans Health Administration (VHA) nursing homes participated in 1 of 3 rounds of cognitive-based interviews, using the instrument in real-life situations. Modifications to the original instrument were guided by a cognitive processing model of instrument refinement. Following 2 rounds of cognitive interviews, pretesting of the revised instrument, and another round of cognitive interviews, the resulting set of 3 short instruments mirrored the concepts of the original longer instrument but were significantly easier for frontline staff to understand and use. Final results indicated frontline staff found the revised instruments feasible to use and clinically relevant in measuring and improving the lived experience of a changing culture. This article provides a framework for developing or adapting other measurement tools for frontline culture change efforts in nursing homes, in addition to reporting on a practical set of instruments to measure aspects of person-centered care.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Applying a Theory-Driven Framework to Guide Quality Improvement Efforts in Nursing Homes: The LOCK Model
    (Oxford University Press, 2018) Mills, Whitney L.; Pimentel, Camilla B.; Palmer, Jennifer A.; Snow, A. Lynn; Wewiorski, Nancy J.; Allen, Rebecca S.; Hartmann, Christine W.; Baylor College of Medicine; University of Massachusetts Worcester; University of Alabama Tuscaloosa; Boston University
    Purpose of the Study: Implementing quality improvement (QI) programs in nursing homes continues to encounter significant challenges, despite recognized need. QI approaches provide nursing home staff with opportunities to collaborate on developing and testing strategies for improving care delivery. We present a theory-driven and user-friendly adaptable framework and facilitation package to overcome existing challenges and guide QI efforts in nursing homes. Design and development: The framework is grounded in the foundational concepts of strengths-based learning, observation, relationship-based teams, efficiency, and organizational learning. We adapted these concepts to QI in the nursing home setting, creating the "LOCK" framework. The LOCK framework is currently being disseminated across the Veterans Health Administration. Results: The LOCK framework has five tenets: (a) Look for the bright spots, (b) Observe, (c) Collaborate in huddles, (d) Keep it bite-sized, and (e) facilitation. Each tenet is described. We also present a case study documenting how a fictional nursing home can implement the LOCK framework as part of a QI effort to improve engagement between staff and residents. The case study describes sample observations, processes, and outcomes. We also discuss practical applications for nursing home staff, the adaptability of LOCK for different QI projects, the specific role of facilitation, and lessons learned. Implications: The proposed framework complements national efforts to improve quality of care and quality of life for nursing home residents and may be valuable across long-term care settings and QI project types.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Blended Facilitation as an Effective Implementation Strategy for Quality Improvement and Research in Nursing Homes
    (Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2019) Pimentel, Camilla B.; Mills, Whitney L.; Palmer, Jennifer A.; Dillon, Kristen; Sullivan, Jennifer L.; Wewiorski, Nancy J.; Snow, Andrea Lynn; Allen, Rebecca S.; Hopkins, Susan D.; Hartmann, Christine W.; Geriatric Research Education & Clinical Center; University of Massachusetts Worcester; US Department of Veterans Affairs; Veterans Health Administration (VHA); Providence VA Medical Center; Harvard University; Hebrew SeniorLife; VA Boston Healthcare System; Boston University; University of Alabama Tuscaloosa
    Background: Blended facilitation, which leverages the complementary skills and expertise of external and internal facilitators, is a powerful strategy that nursing stakeholders and researchers may use to improve implementation of quality improvement (QI) innovations and research performed in nursing homes. Problem: Nursing homes present myriad challenges (eg, time constraints, top-down flow of communication, high staff turnover) to QI implementation and research. Approach: This methods article describes the theory and practical application of blended facilitation and its components (external facilitation, internal facilitation, relationship building, and skill building), using examples from a mixed QI and research intervention in Veterans Health Administration nursing homes. Conclusions: Blended facilitation invites nursing home stakeholders to be equal partners in QI and research processes. Its intentional use may overcome many existing barriers to QI and research performed in nursing homes and, by strengthening relationships between researchers and stakeholders, may accelerate implementation of innovative care practices.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Huddles and their effectiveness at the frontlines of clinical care: a scoping review
    (Springer, 2021) Pimentel, Camilla B.; Snow, A. Lynn; Carnes, Sarah L.; Shah, Nishant R.; Loup, Julia R.; Vallejo-Luces, Tatiana M.; Madrigal, Caroline; Hartmann, Christine W.; Geriatric Research Education & Clinical Center; University of Massachusetts Worcester; University of Alabama Tuscaloosa; Brown University; University of Florida; US Department of Veterans Affairs; Veterans Health Administration (VHA); Providence VA Medical Center; University of Massachusetts Lowell
    BACKGROUND: Brief, stand-up meetings known as huddles may improve clinical care, but knowledge about huddle implementation and effectiveness at the frontlines is fragmented and setting specific. This work provides a comprehensive overview of huddles used in diverse health care settings, examines the empirical support for huddle effectiveness, and identifies knowledge gaps and opportunities for future research. METHODS: A scoping review was completed by searching the databases PubMed, EBSCOhost, ProQuest, and OvidSP for studies published in English from inception to May 31, 2019. Eligible studies described huddles that (1) took place in a clinical or medical setting providing health care patient services, (2) included frontline staff members, (3) were used to improve care quality, and (4) were studied empirically. Two reviewers independently screened abstracts and full texts; seven reviewers independently abstracted data from full texts. RESULTS: Of 2,185 identified studies, 158 met inclusion criteria. The majority (67.7%) of studies described huddles used to improve team communication, collaboration, and/or coordination. Huddles positively impacted team process outcomes in 67.7% of studies, including improvements in efficiency, process-based functioning, and communication across clinical roles (64.4%); situational awareness and staff perceptions of safety and safety climate (44.6%); and staff satisfaction and engagement (29.7%). Almost half of studies (44.3%) reported huddles positively impacting clinical care outcomes such as patients receiving timely and/or evidence-based assessments and care (31.4%); decreased medical errors and adverse drug events (24.3%); and decreased rates of other negative outcomes (20.0%). DISCUSSION: Huddles involving frontline staff are an increasingly prevalent practice across diverse health care settings. Huddles are generally interdisciplinary and aimed at improving team communication, collaboration, and/or coordination. Data from the scoping review point to the effectiveness of huddles at improving work and team process outcomes and indicate the positive impact of huddles can extend beyond processes to include improvements in clinical outcomes.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Impact of Intervention to Improve Nursing Home Resident-Staff Interactions and Engagement
    (Oxford University Press, 2018) Hartmann, Christine W.; Mills, Whitney L.; Pimentel, Camilla B.; Palmer, Jennifer A.; Allen, Rebecca S.; Zhao, Shibei; Wewiorski, Nancy J.; Sullivan, Jennifer L.; Dillon, Kristen; Clark, Valerie; Berlowitz, Dan R.; Snow, Andrea Lynn; Boston University; Baylor College of Medicine; Geriatric Research Education & Clinical Center; University of Massachusetts Worcester; Harvard University; Hebrew SeniorLife; University of Alabama Tuscaloosa; US Department of Veterans Affairs; Veterans Health Administration (VHA); VA Boston Healthcare System
    Background and Objectives: For nursing home residents, positive interactions with staff and engagement in daily life contribute meaningfully to quality of life. We sought to improve these aspects of person-centered care in an opportunistic snowball sample of six Veterans Health Administration nursing homes (e.g., Community Living Centers-CLCs) using an intervention that targeted staff behavior change, focusing on improving interactions between residents and staff and thereby ultimately aiming to improve resident engagement. Research Design and Methods: We grounded this mixed-methods study in the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation, Behavior (COM-B) model of behavior change. We implemented the intervention by (a) using a set of evidence-based practices for implementing quality improvement and (b) combining primarily CLC-based staff facilitation with some researcherled facilitation. Validated resident and staff surveys and structured observations collected pre and post intervention, as well as semi-structured staff interviews conducted post intervention, helped assess intervention success. Results: Sixty-two CLC residents and 308 staff members responded to the surveys. Researchers conducted 1,490 discrete observations. Intervention implementation was associated with increased staff communication with residents during the provision of direct care and decreased negative staff interactions with residents. In the 66 interviews, staff consistently credited the intervention with helping them (a) develop awareness of the importance of identifying opportunities for engagement and (b) act to improve the quality of interactions between residents and staff. Discussion and Implications: The intervention proved feasible and influenced staff to make simple enhancements to their behaviors that improved resident-staff interactions and staff-assessed resident engagement.