Browsing by Author "Carney, Colleen E."

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Behavioral and psychological treatments for chronic insomnia disorder in adults: an American Academy of Sleep Medicine clinical practice guideline
    (American Academy of Sleep Medicine, 2021) Edinger, Jack D.; Arnedt, J. Todd; Bertisch, Suzanne M.; Carney, Colleen E.; Harrington, John J.; Lichstein, Kenneth L.; Sateia, Michael J.; Troxel, Wendy M.; Zhou, Eric S.; Kazmi, Uzma; Heald, Jonathan L.; Martin, Jennifer L.; National Jewish Health; Duke University; University of Michigan; Harvard University; Harvard Medical School; Brigham & Women's Hospital; Toronto Metropolitan University; University of Nebraska Medical Center; University of Alabama Tuscaloosa; Dartmouth College; RAND Corporation; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; Boston Children's Hospital; University of California Los Angeles; University of California Los Angeles Medical Center; David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA; US Department of Veterans Affairs; Veterans Health Administration (VHA); VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System; Geriatric Research Education & Clinical Center
    Introduction: This guideline establishes clinical practice recommendations for the use of behavioral and psychological treatments for chronic insomnia disorder in adults. Methods: The American Academy of Sleep Medicine (AASM) commissioned a task force of experts in sleep medicine and sleep psychology to develop recommendations and assign strengths based on a systematic review of the literature and an assessment of the evidence using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. The task force evaluated a summary of the relevant literature and the quality of evidence, the balance of clinically relevant benefits and harms, patient values and preferences, and resource use considerations that underpin the recommendations. The AASM Board of Directors approved the final recommendations. Recommendations: The following recommendations are intended as a guide for clinicians in choosing a specific behavioral and psychological therapy for the treatment of chronic insomnia disorder in adult patients. Each recommendation statement is assigned a strength ("strong" or "conditional"). A "strong" recommendation (ie, "We recommend...") is one that clinicians should follow under most circumstances. A "conditional" recommendation is one that requires that the clinician use clinical knowledge and experience, and to strongly consider the patient's values and preferences to determine the best course of action. 1. We recommend that clinicians use multicomponent cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia for the treatment of chronic insomnia disorder in adults. (STRONG) 2. We suggest that clinicians use multicomponent brief therapies for insomnia for the treatment of chronic insomnia disorder in adults. (CONDITIONAL) 3. We suggest that clinicians use stimulus control as a single-component therapy for the treatment of chronic insomnia disorder in adults. (CONDITIONAL) 4. We suggest that clinicians use sleep restriction therapy as a single-component therapy for the treatment of chronic insomnia disorder in adults. (CONDITIONAL) 5. We suggest that clinicians use relaxation therapy as a single-component therapy for the treatment of chronic insomnia disorder in adults. (CONDITIONAL) 6. We suggest that clinicians not use sleep hygiene as a single-component therapy for the treatment of chronic insomnia disorder in adults. (CONDITIONAL)
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Behavioral and psychological treatments for chronic insomnia disorder in adults: an American Academy of Sleep Medicine systematic review, meta-analysis, and GRADE assessment
    (American Academy of Sleep Medicine, 2021) Edinger, Jack D.; Arnedt, J. Todd; Bertisch, Suzanne M.; Carney, Colleen E.; Harrington, John J.; Lichstein, Kenneth L.; Sateia, Michael J.; Troxel, Wendy M.; Zhou, Eric S.; Kazmi, Uzma; Heald, Jonathan L.; Martin, Jennifer L.; National Jewish Health; Duke University; University of Michigan; Harvard University; Brigham & Women's Hospital; Harvard Medical School; Toronto Metropolitan University; University of Nebraska Medical Center; University of Alabama Tuscaloosa; Dartmouth College; RAND Corporation; Boston Children's Hospital; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; University of California Los Angeles; University of California Los Angeles Medical Center; David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA; Geriatric Research Education & Clinical Center; US Department of Veterans Affairs; Veterans Health Administration (VHA); VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System
    Introduction: The purpose of this systematic review is to provide supporting evidence for a clinical practice guideline on the use of behavioral and psychological treatments for chronic insomnia disorder in adult populations. Methods: The American Academy of Sleep Medicine commissioned a task force of 9 experts in sleep medicine and sleep psychology. A systematic review was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials that addressed behavioral and psychological interventions for the treatment of chronic insomnia disorder in adults. Statistical analyses were performed to determine if the treatments produced clinically significant improvements in a range of critical and important outcomes. Finally, the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation process was used to evaluate the evidence for making specific treatment recommendations. Results: The literature search identified 1,244 studies; 124 studies met the inclusion criteria, and 89 studies provided data suitable for statistical analyses. Evidence for the following interventions is presented in this review: cognitive-behavioral therapy for insomnia, brief therapies for insomnia, stimulus control, sleep restriction therapy, relaxation training, sleep hygiene, biofeedback, paradoxical intention, intensive sleep retraining, and mindfulness. This review provides a detailed summary of the evidence along with the quality of evidence, the balance of benefits vs harms, patient values and preferences, and resource use considerations.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    The Consensus Sleep Diary: Standardizing Prospective Sleep Self-Monitoring
    (Oxford University Press, 2012) Carney, Colleen E.; Buysse, Daniel J.; Ancoli-Israel, Sonia; Edinger, Jack D.; Krystal, Andrew D.; Lichstein, Kenneth L.; Morin, Charles M.; Toronto Metropolitan University; University of Pittsburgh; University of California San Diego; Duke University; University of Alabama Tuscaloosa; Laval University
    Study Objectives: To present an expert consensus, standardized, patient-informed sleep diary. Methods and Results: Sleep diaries from the original expert panel of 25 attendees of the Pittsburgh Assessment Conference(1) were collected and reviewed. A smaller subset of experts formed a committee and reviewed the compiled diaries. Items deemed essential were included in a Core sleep diary, and those deemed optional were retained for an expanded diary. Secondly, optional items would be available in other versions. A draft of the Core and optional versions along with a feedback questionnaire were sent to members of the Pittsburgh Assessment Conference. The feedback from the group was integrated and the diary drafts were subjected to 6 focus groups composed of good sleepers, people with insomnia, and people with sleep apnea. The data were summarized into themes and changes to the drafts were made in response to the focus groups. The resultant draft was evaluated by another focus group and subjected to lexile analyses. The lexile analyses suggested that the Core diary instructions are at a sixth-grade reading level and the Core diary was written at a third-grade reading level. Conclusions: The Consensus Sleep Diary was the result of collaborations with insomnia experts and potential users. The adoption of a standard sleep diary for insomnia will facilitate comparisons across studies and advance the field. The proposed diary is intended as a living document which still needs to be tested, refined, and validated.